The Partnering Initiative

  • Training and Services
  • Research and Learning
  • Global Impact
  • TPI Tools
  • Home
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • News and Views
  • Publications
  • Multimedia
  • Friends of TPI
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Posts / In praise of internal politicians

December 4, 2017 By Julia Gilbert

In praise of internal politicians

Why getting your own organisation behind a partnership is where most of the hard work lies
By Dave Prescott, Senior Advisor

The term ‘intrapreneur’ has emerged to describe people who stimulate innovation within their companies. A similar role describes the people who are able to navigate the various parts of their own organisations to enable them to engage in a partnership. Taking a cue from this recent HBR article, we can suggest the term ‘internal politician’ to describe an organisation’s partnership champion.

Based on TPI’s experience, it appears though internal work can represent a significant part, if not the majority, of the effort required to make a partnership successful. However brilliant an idea for partnership, however strong the strategic fit, however clear the mutually beneficial objectives, most time and energy usually ends up being invested on internal organisational issues.

Building internal alignment is difficult for at least two reasons: structures, and individuals. Organisational structures can either actively support or strongly block collaborative efforts. And then there’s the human beings. Factors such as communication difficulties, power dynamics, jostling for position, risk aversion, job security fears and clashing egos are all present. Add in the presence of an external partner organisation (or two, or more), where organisational structures and human beings differ, and problems can rapidly multiply.

How to get around these problems? As usual there is no silver bullet solution, but some analysis of an organisation’s structure and key individuals can help to provide useful context. One suggestion is to consider a spectrum with a high degree of centralisation of power at one end and a high degree of decentralisation at the other.

Highly centralised organisations have an obvious hierarchy and clearly delineated roles and responsibilities. Such organisations might be expected to have efficient systems to appoint the right people to a partnership role, and to enable partnerships to proceed efficiently through internal channels. But equally, the desire for centralisation and control can run counter to establishing innovative partnerships, where flexibility is required and decision-making needs to be shared.

At the other end of the spectrum, organisations can be highly federated, with country offices / departments / teams having a high degree of autonomy and their own strong views on partnership working. Some might be ideologically resistant to the idea of engaging business (or NGOs, or others), while others might take a far more pragmatic approach. In these cases, it may be a question of finding the right part of the organisation to work with, and accepting the limits to scale offered by that particular organisation.

Most organisations occupy different parts of the spectrum at different times. They may for example combine extreme hierarchy but have limited clarity on roles and responsibilities; in other cases, a highly chaotic-looking organisation may be very efficiently staffed. The same organisation may at different times demonstrate both types of characteristic, often as a result of who is in charge. And so, while a clear understanding of organisational structure can be useful, it does not in itself imply any particular course of action: it simply helps one to ask the right questions.

Beyond structural factors lurk human beings. As a rule of thumb, people who have worked in more than one sector are normally good allies in progressing a partnership agenda. It can also be useful to consider the length of staff tenure in an organisation. Some long-standing (not necessarily senior) staff with long institutional memories may know short-cuts to getting things done, which overt and covert levers to pull, and so on.

To take a specific case in point: when it comes to the business of getting a partnering agreement developed, it may not be clear whether the procurement department is the first port of call, or the sponsorship department, or the legal department. A sympathetic colleague can cut through the noise and provide clear direction; a suspicious one might do the opposite.

Some seasoned internal politicians bring cross-functional teams along with them to meetings at the early stages of a partnership, to help develop internal traction. Other internal politicians insist on being copied on all correspondence relating to the partnership, so that at least one person knows the whole history of the collaboration, and whenever an issue arises they know the full context and are able to respond accordingly.

Even those with long experience of internal politics find a lot of their time is spent on internal alignment. It is not unusual to spend twice as much time navigating the internal barriers to a partnership agenda (explaining, negotiating, persuading, reframing, insisting, selling, withholding, as necessary), compared to the relatively easy work of external engagement. In fact, if you are expending this ratio of effort, you are probably going along the right lines.

TPI has defined some ‘MUST-have’ competencies for individuals to be effective partnership practitioners. And its ‘Fit for partnering’ framework helps organisations think through the internal structural and cultural issues that enable them to be an effective partner.

Filed Under: Posts, TPI Blog Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA
Refresh

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Fighting side-by-side against COVID-19

    Fighting side-by-side against COVID-19

    April 3, 2020
  • COVID-19: Seven lessons we have learnt about the present and future of partnering

    COVID-19: Seven lessons we have learnt about the present and future of partnering

    January 14, 2021
  • Advancing partnerships to support the SDGs in the Maldives

    Advancing partnerships to support the SDGs in the Maldives

    November 4, 2020
  • Combining my strength in research with my passion for hands on delivery

    Combining my strength in research with my passion for hands on delivery

    October 30, 2020

Latest Tweets

  • Thrilled to see our Trustee @SeandeCleene announced by @UN as a @FoodSystems Champion to galvanize and build networ… https://t.co/5xG6wOXfea October 1, 2020 8:18 am
  • 🚨 We are proud to announce the launch of the "Building Forward Better Framework"!! Alongside @ICMM_com &… https://t.co/HFoCucmqwv September 3, 2020 10:32 am
  • Collaboration between startups and third sector organisations is complex. But once the barriers are overcome, there… https://t.co/veWwk4eQWy July 27, 2020 9:07 am
  • Follow Us

Our Courses

  • Building Effective Partnerships for Sustainable Development
  • Certificate in Partnering Practice
  • Tailored Training

Publications

  • The SDG Partnership Guidebook
  • Maximizing Partnership Value Creation Guidebook
  • Unleashing the Power of Business
  • Internal Prospective Partnership Assessment Tool
  • Partnership Platforms for the Sustainable Development Goals

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive TPI updates.

Sign Up Now
  • Training and Services
  • Research and Learning
  • Global Impact
  • TPI Tools


© 2021 The Partnering Initiative · Privacy Policy · Contact Us · Log in

Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies: Find out more.